🔗 Share this article

Ten years following the UK entered into a hurried referendum that divided the country and caused disorder, a caution comes from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and voters sleepwalked into Brexit and the identical might transpire with a national vote on a united Ireland, initiating convulsions for which nobody is prepared.

That is the message from two prominent journalists from each side of the Irish border who have collaborated to examine the pros and cons of Northern Ireland departing the UK to establish a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Political Institutions Unprepared

The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are extremely unprepared for a possibly fraught and seismic public vote.

"The key takeaway of Brexit remains unheeded, which is that stuff can arise suddenly and can build support very quickly," the commentator stated. "It is my view that the political architecture of our archipelago remains very unstable."

Released Volume Seeks to Stir Debate

The team have studied the governmental, financial and cultural arguments for any governmental shift in a volume, Examining Irish Unification, published by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to provoke discussion on the issue with a tour of lectures that will bring them to Westminster soon.

"What concerns everyone, or ought to concern everybody, is the Brexit vote of 2016," said O’Toole.

"We do not want a national vote on a thumbs up-thumbs down, vague proposition whose consequences have not been clarified because then you find yourself with an highly split population where those defeated are unable to accept losing and the victorious side don't know precisely what it is that they have won."

Governmental Mandate

Under the peace accord, the Northern Ireland official must arrange a referendum on Irish unity if it appears likely that a majority would approve.

Nationalist parties and other pro-unification groups argue such a time is looming, and a organisation called Ireland’s Future has garnered backing, but both governments and unionists minimise the likelihood, leaving it unclear whether or when there could be a national vote.

Lack of Serious Debate

Political rhetoric for and against unity has hidden the absence of informed dialogue, said McBride.

"People tend to be supportive or opposed the notion but the actual thinking which may surpass that to realise it has largely not occurred. A great deal has gone on in universities but scarcely any government figures or activists want to engage with even the fundamentals. To illustrate, what sort of state should be desired? Centralised? Decentralised?"

Volume's Strategy

In the volume, neither author advocates unification or the current situation. Both authors two essays that strive for impartiality in detailing the argument for a unified Ireland and the case against, assembling economic and societal figures, previous instances and structural examples.

Discussions range over national emblems, taxes, health services, elderly benefits, sovereign debt obligations and the threat of unionist unrest. The goal is to educate and provoke discussion.

"Considerable attention exists in the issue but there has not yet occurred a discussion," stated the writer. "Dialogue implies an acknowledgement of the concept that there could be reasonable perspectives on either side."

Dual Referendums

A public vote in Northern Ireland would simultaneously prompt one in the Republic of Ireland, where citizens say they prefer unification but refuse paying higher taxes or implementing a new flag to recognise pro-UK communities' British identity.

"Authorities in Dublin must determine what the offer from pro-unification movements is other than just declaring: 'We want a unified Ireland and we love you'," remarked O’Toole.

Likelihood of Public Vote

The journalist believes a referendum in his generation is likely and that it might occur unexpectedly. "There might be just a reckless or a bad or a feckless secretary of state who says: 'Let us proceed and resolve it.'"

Both nationalists and unionists have reasonable, legitimate arguments, he commented. "Somebody will succeed in this matter and somebody will in the end be defeated but all factions has possesses valuable insights to gain from the alternative positions."

Appeal for Wider Dialogue

Westminster needed to participate in the dialogue, said O’Toole. "This concerns the United Kingdom. It's a British question equally as it is an Irish issue."