🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy presents a misguided view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies pose an grave threat to the continent's identity. However, this perspective rests on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge confronting Europe is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Gap Separating the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry thirteen and a half percent increase for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, about 50% of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Problem

This widening economic gap is driven by superior efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology dominance is decidedly US-centric. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing issue: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine unified investment market, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a service under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 different national regimes, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, business failure was historically met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, there are causes for hope. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose substantial change. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

Given appropriate incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable advantages: high-quality human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now stands at a decisive moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.